Hi all,<br>The discussion so far <br><br style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Saad Shakeel says</span><br> 2. Need equally fast photodiode and 74xx ics<br> 3. faster ne592 alternate as it only works at 10nS<br>
4. we might be able to use the bf908 since it supports upto 1 GHz.<br><br><span style="font-weight: bold;">Thomas Egenhofer says</span><br>- Think over encoding technique<br> 1. 2 level encoding at 100 mbps could run into problems.<br>
2. 2 level encoding would require rise and fall times of .5ns !<br> 3. MLT3, coming from the LAN card could be used (30ns), requiring in rise and fall times of 15ns of LED <br> 4. It would require redesigning the transmitter<br>
5. He already has a prototype MTL3 reciever at <a href="http://home.arcor.de/positiveelectron/files/MLT-3-receiver.png">http://home.arcor.de/positiveelectron/files/MLT-3-receiver.png</a><br><br>Meanwhile <span style="font-weight: bold;">CD930 shows</span> us he already has a 100 Mbps version, but alas the in the clutches of proprietary license<br>
He has videos at <br> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h3hDm32kv4">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9h3hDm32kv4</a><br> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcjaJhMHcNk">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcjaJhMHcNk</a><br>
<br>and even better people like<span style="font-weight: bold;"> Jim Thompson </span>are waiting to be convinced to finance a 100 Mbps version.<br><br><br style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">What are we waiting for ?</span><br>
<br>Regards,<br>Deepak<br>