Yeah you are right, there have been discussions in the past, people have discussed lasers etc even FPGA. I thought if we would enumerate the problems and the changes required, it would be easy for people to start making changes to the design. Different people could work at different problems and then could combine the solution, very much like growth of the Linux kernel, in the true spirit of open source.<br>
<br>Regards,<br>Deepak<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 19/02/2008, <b class="gmail_sendername">J.D. Bakker</b> <<a href="mailto:jdb@lartmaker.nl">jdb@lartmaker.nl</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
>Hi people,<br>>100 Mbps open source FSO, I think would revolutionize the wireless link scene.<br>>I am really confused as to what is really holding back the<br>>development of 100 Mbps RONJA, even when every thing is open source<br>
>and free.<br>>I start this thread to exactly pin point the problems of a 100 Mbps RONJA.<br>>Let us reach to a conclusion as to what exactly must be modified.<br>><br>>Let us start with the LED,<br>>1. To transmit at 100 mbps,we must find an LED which can switch on<br>
>and off in 1 ns.<br>><br>>So what else is on the list ?<br><br>This has been discussed a few times in the past; please have a look<br>at the list archives.<br><br>JDB.<br>--<br>LART. 250 MIPS under one Watt. Free hardware design files.<br>
<a href="http://www.lartmaker.nl/">http://www.lartmaker.nl/</a><br><br>--<br>Twibright Ronja mailing list <a href="http://ronja.twibright.com">http://ronja.twibright.com</a><br><a href="mailto:Ronja@lists.pointless.net">Ronja@lists.pointless.net</a><br>
<a href="http://pointless.net/mailman/listinfo/ronja">http://pointless.net/mailman/listinfo/ronja</a><br></blockquote></div><br>