<div> Good work, We've all been looking for some alternative...</div> <div> </div> <div> Can you include the schematic of the circuit on your blog too.</div> <div> </div> <div>You've mentioned 74hc245, but the pic has some other components too? </div> <div> </div> <div>Thanks</div> <div> </div> <div>Saad<BR><BR><B><I>Jakub Ladman <ladmanj@volny.cz></I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Dne Saturday 02 February 2008 14:20:33 Pramod yaduvanshi napsal(a):<BR>> Hi all ... please check out my blog now .. after i have made the circuit on<BR>> PCB and using proper coaxial cables and filtered the inout power supply .<BR>> http://luxeonstar.blogspot.com/<BR><BR>I think even coaxial cable to led is bad.<BR>It reduces EMI polution, but the inductance of wires is high, so fast current <BR>changes are impossible.<BR>Place the LED as close
to driver ic as possible.<BR>Then try some data flow test and tell us the distance from transmitter to <BR>receiver, where is not any packet loss yet.<BR>A standard ronja distance is about two meters, which corresponds to 1400m with <BR>optics.<BR><BR>Jakub Ladman<BR><BR>-- <BR>Twibright Ronja mailing list http://ronja.twibright.com<BR>Ronja@lists.pointless.net<BR>http://pointless.net/mailman/listinfo/ronja<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p> 
<hr size=1>Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ "> Try it now.</a>