[manchesterwireless] Warrington Wireless - interference?
gARetH baBB
hick.w.manchester at gink.org
Thu Oct 27 11:17:23 BST 2005
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Andy Gauton wrote:
> Will Ch13 be far enough away from Ch11 to avoid interference?
They aren't entirely overlap free, but it's going to be the best you're
going to get I reckon if you have loads of consumer equipment (which
usually ignores channels above 11 anyway) about.
> However, BT Voyager in NetStumbler is reporting Ch8, but very strong
> signal. So, either this is correct, or this is SuperG misreporting?
If it's channel 8, it isn't Atheros SuperG in Turbo mode.
Everything I can see about the BT Voyager says they probably use Broadcom
anway.
> The ideal solution would be to find BT Voyager neighbour and see if we can
> change his/her channel to a non-overlapping.
I have no idea about Broadcom's Afterburner mode.
> I am worried, because BT Voyager's signal strength seems stronger in the
> road than our Linksys boxes with external antennas. I can't for one minute
> believe they are using anything other than the standard antennas.
That depends on antennas and where you measure the signal - remember
antennas don't increase power, they just focus it more.
If they have a small stub antenna basically going splat, you are going to
see more of its power nearby than an antenna which may be focusing its
power in a more ... focused way.
More information about the ManchesterWireless
mailing list